CSU student in jail for “Va. Tech” remark

Posted on February 4th, 2012 by Gabrielle Frome and filed under Legal News

XENIA — A Central State University student is in jail and is scheduled to have a jury trial after allegedly telling campus employees he “wouldn’t be afraid” to “pull a Virginia Tech.”

Charles D. McCornell, 27, was arrested Tuesday and charged with inducing panic and disorderly conduct. The first charge is a first-degree misdemeanor and the second a fourth-degree misdemeanor.

He was arraigned Wednesday in Xenia Municipal Court. A jury trial is scheduled for March 1.

He remains in the Greene County Jail in lieu of $10,000 bond.

McCornell has also been ordered not to be on or around the CSU campus.

The Dayton Daily News on Wednesday obtained a copy of the incident report from the CSU Department of Public Safety.

According to that department, the incident occurred Feb. 1 in Wesley

Full Article…

Department of Justice Prioritizes Improving Legal Representation for Indigent Defendants

Posted on February 3rd, 2012 by Abigail Bosch and filed under Law Quotes

Almost 50 years ago the decision determined that the Constitution required defendants in criminal cases to be provided with legal counsel, even if they cannot afford an attorney.   Yet all across this country – the basic rights guaranteed under have yet to be fully realized.   Millions of Americans still struggle to access the legal services that they need and deserve – and to which they are constitutionally entitled.  

Speaking before the American Bar Association’s (ABA) National Summit on Indigent Defense, Attorney General Eric Holder announced a series of initiatives that the Justice Department will undertake to strengthen legal representation for individuals too poor to hire a lawyer to represent them in criminal proceedings.

 As the Attorney General observed:

Across the country, public defender offices and other indigent defense providers are underfunded and understaffed.  Too often, when legal representation is available to the poor, it’s rendered less effective by insufficient resources, overwhelming caseloads, and inadequate oversight. 

The Department’s Access to Justice Initiative has been working with many offices within the department to develop the following initiatives that advance and support  equal access to legal representation, regardless of income. 

These efforts include the following:

Strengthening Indigent Defense through Implemention of the ABA Ten Principles

The ABA Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System represent fundamental building blocks for implementing quality legal representation. Released in 2002, the

Full Article…

Dallas County Commissioners react to outrage over appointment

Posted on January 25th, 2012 by Gabrielle Frome and filed under Legal News

DALLAS – The Dallas County Commission made a last-minute agenda change concerning a controversial appointment to the Homeland Security Advisory Council. John Wiley Price nominated a man named Aaron McCarthy, also known as Aaron Michaels, to the council. However the vote to approve the appointee has been postponed. The nomination infuriated civil rights groups – because McCarthy founded “New Black Panther Party for Self Defense.” The Anti-Defamation League says the group is the “largest organized anti-Semitic and racist black militant group in America.” The original Black Panthers call the group a “black racist hate group.” Aaron Michaels is best known nationally as the founder of the radical activist organization the New Black Panther Party.

Full Article…

GPS violated 4th Amendment, Supreme Court rules

Posted on January 21st, 2012 by Leah Schonell and filed under Justice Points

Attaching a GPS to a car for the purposes of gathering evidence is a search and is prohibited by the Fourth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.   The justices were unanimous in their opinion in U.S. v. Jones, but divided on the rationale.  While the majority based its holding on search and seizure law, Justice Samuel Alito’s concurrence said the court should rely on whether the respondent’s reasonable expectations of privacy were violated.  Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined the majority opinion, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, but also wrote a separate concurrence to suggest that the court may need to revisit privacy issues. Also jo

Full Article…